The
People’s Vote campaign is proposing a referendum
which Remain is guaranteed to win
The objective of the People’s Vote
campaign and its supporters is to overturn the result of the 2016 referendum
and keep the UK in the EU. To that end,
they are demanding a referendum with a Remain option on the ballot paper.
But what other options do they
envisage? This is crucial in determining
whether the ballot is fair (which will be a matter for the Electoral
Commission). According to a BBC report:
“The People's Vote campaign, which wants a
referendum on the final Brexit deal, says a choice between Theresa May's deal
and remaining in the EU is their preferred choice.”
This was echoed by Sir Vince Cable, leader
of the Lib Dems and prominent advocate for a “people’s vote”, on Any Questions on
Radio 4 on 15 December 2018 (see here, after 39
minutes). Pressed by Jonathan Dimbleby in the chair to specify the options he envisaged on
the ballot paper, he said:
1. “Do you wish to adopt the Brexit deal that’s been
negotiated by the Government?”
2. “Or would you choose to remain within the
European Union?”
So, if the People’s Vote campaign get
their way, there will be a referendum with the two options:
1. Leave under Prime Minister May’s Deal
2.
Remain
You don’t need to be an expert in
psephology to work out that Remain will win that contest easily, for the simple
reason that a large number of Brexiteers are opposed
to the Prime Minister’s Deal and would never vote for it.
If such a referendum did take place,
the net effect would be to overturn the result of the June 2016 referendum by
holding a second referendum that Remain would inevitably win. Some people, particularly those who voted
Leave in June 2016, might consider that unfair and get very, very angry about
it.
It is important to note that the referendum
being proposed by the People’s Vote campaign is NOT a re-run of the June 2016
referendum in which there were two unambiguous options:
1. Leave
2. Remain
that is, with a Leave option that everybody who
favoured the UK leaving the EU could choose without reservation.
A
referendum to choose Brexit option?
Interest in holding another referendum has
increased because of the difficulty getting a majority
in the House of Commons for a particular Brexit option. Of course, it is possible to resolve this
difficulty by referendum without re-opening the issue of the UK’s membership of
the EU – by the clever device of not having a Remain option on the ballot
paper.
For example:
(a)
An Accept/Reject referendum on the Prime
Minister’s Deal, or
(b)
A referendum allowing people to choose between
the two available Brexit options the Prime Minister’s Deal and No Deal
Both of these would respect the result
of the 2016 referendum. Under (a) the
matter would remain unresolved if voters reject Prime Minister’s Deal. (b) has the
advantage of resolving the matter, probably in favour of the Prime Minister’s
Deal, since Remainers would vote overwhelmingly for
it.
Note on the
People’s Vote campaign
The People’s Vote campaign has sought support from
the public on the basis of a petition, in which they
say:
“If the Brexit deal is rejected by Parliament, then
we, the people of Britain, should have the democratic right to determine our
own future. That is why we are demanding a People’s Vote on the Brexit
deal.”
And in their “arguments for” a
People’s Vote, they say:
Why we need
a People’s Vote on a final Brexit deal
We are
campaigning for the people to be given their democratic right of a People’s
Vote on the final Brexit deal.
Brexit is a big deal, but it is not a done deal and
no deal, or bad deal, it is the people who must decide.
The People’s Vote is not about re-fighting the
referendum of 2016.
Reading this, you could be forgiven for thinking
that People’s Vote campaign accept the result of the 2016 referendum and that
their objective is merely to have a referendum (such as (a) above) to ascertain
whether the Brexit deal agreed with the EU is acceptable to the people of the
UK. There is no mention there that they
want a Remain option on the ballot paper.
David
Morrison
17 December
2018